this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
645 points (98.6% liked)

World News

41487 readers
3766 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Volodymyr Zelensky left the White House early without signing a mineral deal with the United States following a heated exchange with President Donald Trump on Feb. 28.

Zelensky departed in his motorcade around 1:45 p.m. local time, without holding a joint news conference scheduled for later in the day, after the two leaders got into a heated argument while speaking with journalists in the Oval Office.

. . .

CNN reported that following the exchange, Zelensky and Trump left to separate rooms, with the Ukrainian delegation wanting to continue talks with the Trump administration.

Trump later ordered his officials to tell the Ukrainian officials to leave the White House, despite protest from the Ukrainian delegation.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 127 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The wording is so insane to me. Like he was just begging to sign that deal. lol

There's no way he was going to sign it. He didn't come to the US to sign it. He came here to negotiate into a reasonable deal for both countries. This headline makes it sound like he lost out, and he really didn't. Like, sure, we could have swooped in and helped Ukraine a little more, but in return we would get billions, maybe even trillions in return... It's literally war profiteering out in the open.

That kind of shit used to be illegal and now we have Presidents televising his profiteering... This timeline is fucking nuts.

[–] Randomgal 10 points 1 day ago

I bet he chose to leave but Trump couldn't handle the Truth.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ukraine's mineral resources really aren't even that considerable on a global scale. They're not insignificant but their economic value at the moment, even setting aside the war, doesn't have American companies salivating.

This minerals for protection thing apparently was floated by Ukraine first to the Biden administration and Trump campaign. The Biden administration didn't do much with it because, among other things, the actual economic and practical value was questionable.

Trump, on the other hand, just wants to be seen making deals. Zelenskyy and Ukraine first floated the general idea because they knew Trump is highly transactional and it'd give Trump an easy "win."

I highly doubt trillions in profits are anywhere in the mix.

And you don't want to negotiate anything with Trump directly. If Zelenskyy did that intentionally, he dropped the ball. Trump is far too mercurial and often only grasps issues in the most basic of senses. Trying to get into a nuts and bolts negotiation with him is pointless. Hammer that out first, get something signable without too onerous of long term commitments, compliment him, sign, move on.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So there's a huge deposit between Mariupol and Donetsk, which is in Russian controlled territory. It's probably the easiest to mine and most economically viable... I think that was the original plan Zelensky was thinking. Get some American mining infrastructure there and then thr US has skin in the game.

Trump seems to have a survey of the entire countries rare earth resources and is just taking the entire estimated value and splitting in half. Which as you pointed out is stupid, because a lot of the deposits are smaller or would be much more expensive to mine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think this is why Putin also was quick to mention cooperating with the USA on minerals in Russia (which from his POV includes those regions). I'm sure Zelenskyy/Ukraine would want to try to use that as leverage but I don't think Trump bites.

There are some substantial reserves of various minerals elsewhere but not sure how viable and valuable they really are.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

You mean in Ukraine? There are tons of other stuff to mine and even some rare earth outside of controlled area... It just is probably less profitable to mine. Here is a map

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ukraine’s mineral resources really aren’t even that considerable on a global scale.

Give me $10,000, because you know, on a global scale it's not a lot of money, so you shouldn't worry about handing it over to me. /s

For some people, $10,000 is a lot. A metric like "global scale" is so..... Fuck, I can't even think of a word. Assholic. You're an asshole for using a word like that to describe this situation like it's no big deal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Give me $10,000, because you know, on a global scale it's not a lot of money, so you shouldn't worry about handing it over to me."

Hello strawman, someone put this ridiculous statement in a logic 101 course textbook. I mean, dafuq are you on about?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You see, it is a ridiculous statement. Which is why I'm bewildered that you were dumb enough to say it in the first place and you don't see the sheer irony of calling what I said a strawman argument but not your own.

It's like you don't live in reality.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

By god. I mean. Wow. Oof.

I am in no way (edit: nor have I ever even implied) devaluing Ukraine to mean that their only value is mineral resources. Why you concluded that is beyond me and baffling. Literally.

Ukrainians are certainly worth much, much than those resources in my view. Let's say Ukraine's natural resources literally magically disappeared overnight. So what? They still deserve justice and then some and we should protect democracies when and where possible.

Regardless, spinning minerals into some conspiracy theory with the USA extracting phantom trillions doesn't advance Ukraine's cause.

Dude I try to be polite here for its own sake but go touch some grass.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I am in no way (edit: nor have I ever even implied) devaluing Ukraine to mean that their only value is mineral resources.

That's interesting, because that's not what I implied at all. Keep digging though. I have faith you'll catch it eventually. I'll give you a hint;

Ukraine’s mineral resources really aren’t even that considerable on a global scale. They’re not insignificant but their economic value at the moment, even setting aside the war, doesn’t have American companies salivating.

See it yet? The strawman that you yourself used, I used back at you in a different context that you were able to correctly identify as a strawman but called mine bad but still think yours is good? lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

lmao you're just smashing dunning kruger my dude. If you have an actual point just come out and say it. You're trying to bend logical fallacies in a way that doesn't work and starts to veer towards narcissism.

TBH, I think you know you started out on a foundation of absurd bullshit and now painted in a corner you're just lashing out, hoping that you can intimidate people by blatantly misusing arguements.

You're welcome to try to prove me wrong

[–] [email protected] -2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Best part is that these posts are public. So literally everyone can visually see your lack of awareness, your sociopathy and inability to see where you've gone wrong, and you continually digging yourself deeper.

Crazy times we live in.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago

So you got nothing, eh?

[–] stardust 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

US assurance means as much as Russian assurance anyways, and US is known to go back on deals they themselves proposed and signed like what they are doing to Canada. So if the US isn't even making a good faith attempt at a deal they likely wouldn't stick to in order to protect Ukraine it just shows how corrupt negotions were from the start.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

that is why it is important for smaller countries to join up to form something like EU and etc. so as to function like a big country.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

That's what the article says. Zelensky wanted to continue negotiations.

There are things the US has that they cannot get from the EU. If there would ever be a deal that would be the basis.