this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
372 points (97.7% liked)

Work Reform

10729 readers
315 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tempest 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Generally the actual term used is technocrat.

People opposed to them would generally say they get focused on the end result and neglect the human aspect.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where did you hear that? Technocracy means rule by specialists and technical experts. For example, in a technocracy, career bureaucrats aren’t in charge of ecological policy.

[–] tempest 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You can have a technocrat without a technocracy. There is no reason a technocrat cannot be a career burocrate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Is this guy called a technocrat because he actually wants his engineers to rule?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

This doesn't seem different than any other business dude exhorting his employees to do an extra grind for "the company mission" when it's really just for his ego and profits. Grind culture exists in law, finance, sales, etc. Anywhere that employees are not paid overtime for overworking (mostly, hourly plus commission jobs might have a low base rate and not care about the extra overtime expense).

Techies are particularly vulnerable to it as they're usually younger salaried employees who aren't as apt about demanding a personal upside if they're asked to sacrifice their personal lives for the company's benefit.