Asklemmy

45414 readers

1273 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

If your government proposed an initiative to tackle fraud, but the initiative would cost more than it would save, would you support it or not? (lemmy.world)

submitted 15 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I ask because we had a situation in Ireland just like this many years ago. It was for welfare fraud specifically and faced criticism for a few reasons. One was that the suspected levels of fraud may have been much lower than the politician was claiming. The other reason was that the cost of tackling it could likely outweigh any savings.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] skankhunt42 3 points 14 hours ago

I'd support it because criminals shouldn't be rewarded for their actions. If they are, more people would do it and now It'll cost even more to stop everyone from doing it.