this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
1120 points (97.5% liked)

196

18049 readers
1045 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago (4 children)

The reason it gets cut down so much is the advertised jackpot is the 25 year pay over time annuity amount. You get only about half if you take lump sum. And THEN that's taxed at a high bracket.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Half? So they could get 850 over 25 years? That's 34 million/year... Or 2.8mil/month... In what world is that not enough? Unless you're afraid they're gonna stop paying you after like a year or two, which is fair, especially in this day and age.. yeah, okay, I've changed my mind, I'd take the lump sum too.. not risking it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Other than "they're gonna stop paying you" there's also the risk of inflation making it so you receive way less overall, since I doubt the amount gets adjusted to match inflation.

But yes, if the jackpot is so high that you'd get 2+mil per month, assuming you're so worried about the dollar being worthless soon, you can still take the 2mil/mo and diversify. After a year you should already have plenty money to live comfortably for the rest of your life.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)