this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
36 points (100.0% liked)

Legal News

436 readers
87 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Probably shouldn't have put his name on it, mind.

Case file: https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/US-v-Lu-2021.pdf

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Finally, on October 7, 2019, Lu "admitted to investigators that he created the code described."

[...] said Lu's attorney, Ian Friedman, adding that they intended to appeal. "Davis and his supporters believe in his innocence and this matter will be reviewed at the appellate level."

Never admit culpability. There's always the chance some unknown nation-state-level hacker or other disgruntled employee is doing active sabotage and using the name and credentials of a recently laid off employee to do it. That's what an intelligent hacker would do, not foolishly leave their own name and credentials attached all over the incriminating data.

Cops always want confessions because proving a crime happened is much harder. Especially with highly tamperable computers which are so difficult to explain to juries.