this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
32 points (83.3% liked)

UK Politics

3518 readers
84 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I reckon it’s time to call it. The threat to freeze personal independence payment (Pip) disability benefits shows that the fears voiced in the run-up to the general election were well founded. Keir Starmer’s government, cratering in the polls, with Reform snapping at its heels, is in serious trouble. Weekend reports suggested the latest cuts are being reconsidered after a backlash from Labour’s own MPs, charities and campaigners. It’s all vintage Labour, swinging between collected callousness and then flustered chaos.

Prior to the election, sceptics were told to keep the faith. Focus on the prize of getting the Tories out. It’s all three-dimensional chess, to whisper to rightwing voters. Starmer’s caution and inconsistency is only pragmatism, which could turn to radicalism in office.

But you don’t hear that much any more. The radicalism not only has not transpired, but something else, something cold and stomach-sinking, has emerged: a government clear in its intent on making savings by targeting the most vulnerable in society – the sick, disabled people, mentally ill people. This isn’t simply a locking in of the austerity state Labour inherited, but an extension of it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I mean, sure. If you ignore all the good things they're doing, they're only doing bad things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nobody expects Labour to do zero positive things. That does not mean they are not red tories whose failure to address the needs of working people will eventually usher the Reform Party into power.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

The first reply to my comment literally asks:

Genuine question, what good things?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Genuine question, what good things? Part of the problem of only getting news from podcasts and social media is that I very loudly get all the bad things and maybe the good things are being drowned out.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Sure! These are some things that I think were good. Obviously it's fair enough if you don't agree! I'll try and keep these fairly recent.

On the environment:

On workers' rights:

On housing, homelessness and renting:

On health:

On foreign policy:

I could go on but I don't want to take up too much of your time (or mine!). Byline Times had a good recent list (some overlap with my suggestions).

Of course you might think that the bad outweighs the good, but it's important to acknowledge the good is really happening. Also, a lot of the above I would argue doesn't go far enough (but that's typical of me), so if that's how you feel, you'll get no argument from me.

On the particular issue Nesrine Malik is discussing in the original post, I completely agree that it's a terrible decision (I actually just emailed my MP about it this morning to ask him to vote against it), but even on that, the government has been listening to criticism and they have walked back some of the worst aspects of it (as this article describes). That said, I still think it's a horrible plan.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but apart from those, what good are they doing???

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

'Cancelled the Rwanda scheme?'

'Cancelled the Rwanda--? Oh, shut up!'

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well yes, cancelled the Rwanda scheme, that goes without saying...

But seriously, your comments here and the other person asking the "genuine question" make a good point. Clicks mean cash and anger gets clicks.

I imagine that the media will whip up the same level of hate for Starmer's government as they did for the previous Conservative one over the next four years and Reform or some other wacko rightwing party will bamboozle enough people who might regret voting for them afterwards to get in next time and like the US we'll descend into an authoritarian hellscape.

Time to build a bunker or get REALLY good at giving blowjobs.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

Renationalising the railways is the main one that comes to mind.