this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
252 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

66711 readers
6456 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I mean "Brother says" is most definitely not proof that that person was wrong. Here's the question: Has anyone else able to verify their claim? Surely there are tens of thousands of printers out there that someone could verify...?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I dont see how the burden of proof is on Brother. If you're looking for verification from tens of thousands of other printer users and hearing crickets, i think you have your answer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I dont see how the burden of proof is on Brother.

There is no "burden of proof" at all. Anyone is welcome to provide proof at any time.

If you're looking for verification from tens of thousands of other printer users and hearing crickets, i think you have your answer.

I didn't look.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The burden of proof should be on whoever is making a claim. If someone accuses me of doing something with no evidence, my verbal denial shouldn't be skeptical without proof. Brother isn't in a position that they should require to provide proof against the claim being made against them. I didn't see any mention in the article of other user's printers being bricked aside from the original claim from 2022. Maybe some further investigation would come up with something, but claims made on Reddit posts and YouTube videos hardly count as proof of anything.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but they don't need to be proof of anything. Rossmann reported on some users (I think there were multiple?) claiming something to be the case, and provided one bit of verifiable evidence: no access to older firmware.

Brother claims they don't intentionally brick printers that use third party cartridges, but that's not verifiable. Brother also didn't mention anything about why older firmware isn't available. That's a significant concern, since that would be a way for customers to prove that the firmware itself is the issue (printer works -> upgrade -> broken -> downgrade -> printer works).

I think it's 100% fair to raise the concern. It's certainly not enough to warrant any kind of legal action, but it is enough for customers to investigate the claims for themselves. I think that's worthwhile.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

I can agree with that, perhaps I misinterpreted the previous comments.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There is no "burden of proof" at all. Anyone is welcome to provide proof at any time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Maybe I misinterpreted either your previous comments or what the article is saying. But I can agree with that.