this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
67 points (98.6% liked)

Fedigrow

1095 readers
225 users here now

To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

Resources:

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

https://grafana.lem.rocks/d/bdid38k9p0t1cf/federation-health-single-instance-overview?orgId=1&var-instance=lemmy.world&var-remote_instance=aussie.zone

Parallel sending of federated activities to other instances. This can be especially useful for instances on the other side of the world, where latency introduces serious bottlenecks when only sending one activity at a time. A few instances have already been using intermediate software to batch activities together, which is not standard ActivityPub behavior, but it allows them to eliminate most of the delays introduced by latency. This mostly affects instances in Australia and New Zealand, but we’ve also seen federation delays with instances in US from time to time. This will likely not be enabled immediately after the upgrade, but we’re planning to enable this shortly after.

https://lemmy.world/post/23471887

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

LW is too big to effectively federate

LW is like ~35% of Lemmy's 55K MAU, right? So around ~19K MAU. For the Threadiverse to be viable on a mass scale, support for an instance with ~20K MAUs is a must. I would argue it's a must for an instance with 2 million MAUs.

This includes graceful support for up/down votes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The issue is more about the spread of active communities and their centralization on LW.

LW comments make it just fine to Aussie.zone on this community, as it's on Lemm.ee: https://aussie.zone/post/18681158/15483480

When you look at the most active communities on the platform, the vast majority of them are on LW: https://lemmyverse.net/communities?order=active

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I get that, I just don't think at this particular point in time (with 55K MAU) it is viable to focus on distribution of communities.

It's not like we have 10 million MAUs and we are seeing too much centralization on LW.

Let's get to at least say 500 K MAU stable and then focus on decentralization.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

On the other hand, it's probably easier to decentralize while we have 55K MAU rather than 500K

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

That's also true, can't argue with that.