this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
1296 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

10978 readers
210 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheAthena@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I just want my slightly smaller than a Tacoma sized truck with a small diesel that gets like 28 mpg. Is that really too much to ask?

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I want one of those old 90s Toyota trucks so bad, I wish they still made them. Like that little black truck in back to the future.

[–] _synack@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That truck was from 1985, but I know what you mean. That truck was awesome!

At least the Ford Maverick is something that exists. I know it’s based on an Escape platform, but that’s fine for most uses of trucks that size.

[–] TheAthena@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yep. In the US. The hilux would be the ideal vehicle.

load more comments (2 replies)