Privacy

2164 readers

333 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

Be civil and no prejudice
Don't promote big-tech software
No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
No reposting of news that was already posted
No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 6 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

otter

[email protected]

Trust Report DeepSeek R1: "Critical levels of risk with security and ethics, high levels of risk with privacy, stereotype, toxicity, hallucination, and fairness" (www.vijil.ai)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A Trust Report for DeepSeek R1 by VIJIL, a security resercher company, indicates critical levels of risk with security and ethics, high levels of risk with privacy, stereotype, toxicity, hallucination, and fairness, a moderate level of risk with performance, and a low level of risk with robustness.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Vijil is some shitty AI auditing startup that appears to have only "reviewed" this one product.

So when it says Deepseek is bad, the answer to "compared to what?" is "lol, idk, hopefully not the things my customers want to use."

And when it says Deepseek isn't private, it has absolutely nothing to do with a fully offline model, but just the responses to some of its synthetic tests.

These benchmarks are, effectively, useless.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

What are good benchmarks in that respect?