this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
542 points (98.0% liked)
Fediverse
32349 readers
585 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Rent comes before server. An outage is a wonderful motivator, turn that shit off.
I assume he's applying donations to the server costs first, then considers extra as profit/salary. We should be considering developer time as a core part of server costs, but I think people would react poorly if server donations went to personal expenses before server expenses.
I think one of the best thing hosts could do is be transparent about costs and how much time maintenance takes and what sort of effective wage they are getting.
The distinction is an illusion. If a person can't afford to live, and a part of their life is running a server, who gives a fuck which dollar goes where?
(Other than all the dipshits who offer 0 and demand anything more than nothing.)
It depends on if the shortfall in rent is coming from something server related. If stux is pulling a good salary for his hosting work and the shortfall just came from a different job falling through, that's a fine time to ask for donations, but not something people would feel warrants shutting down the server rather than taking out a loan.
Or we could drop the whole idea of depending on "donations" and understand that admins are professionals who would like to make a living like everyone else?
I'm fine having the burden spread unevenly. I don't mind donating more so that a free platform is available to anyone who wants to use it. Whether something is funded by donations or fees is separate from whether the cost of people's time should be included in the revenue target.
Yeah, but where are the admins who dare to say "I think my work is worth $15k/month, so I will only keep the instance open if we collect that much money"?
There aren't, because the majority of users will see that "profiteering" and flat out refuse to contribute. Or they will come up with the worst excuses to diminish the work of the admins, which in the end translate to "I don't make that much money, how could I justify accepting that your work is more valuable than mine?" crab mentality.
Unfortunately we have a whole generaton of entitled babies who scream "paywall!!!" every time somebody asks for compensation for their work
Nah, don't give that much credit to a loud minority.