this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
899 points (99.6% liked)

Political Memes

7636 readers
3946 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The meme is referencing the official US Trade Representative's explanation^1^ of the tariffs, where yes, the math really is as stupid as it seems, but it gets worse.

The research that Trump's team used to determine that "calculation" flat out states that when the US tries to tariff other countries:

  1. American importers pay for the US tariff AND
  2. American exporters pay for the foreign retaliatory tariffs.

The source clearly demonstrates that American tariffs are paid directly by Americans in both directions, meaning out of everyone on Earth the tariffs screw the US the most. Trump's administration legitimized the source by citing that research for its calculations on the tariff rates.

The explanation freely admits that the stupid parameters were chosen more or less arbitrarily, and they cited the paper (Cavallo et al 2021)^2^ but conveniently didn't list it in their "References" section.

Our analyses indicate that the price incidence of US import tariffs falls largely on the United States... Our results suggest that retailers are absorbing a significant share of the increase in the cost of affected imports by earning lower profit margins on those goods... [These analyses reveal] that the recent tariffs applied by foreign governments on US exports have affected total foreign import prices far less than was the case for the recent US tariffs

~1~ ~https://web.archive.org/web/20250403013314/https://ustr.gov/issue-areas/reciprocal-tariff-calculations~

~2~ ~https://www.nber.org/papers/w26396~

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Didn’t they also mark EU VAT as a tariff?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Both links just return errors for me.

Edit: fixed. For some reason there were additional characters in the links on my end, possibly some formatting issue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Seems like a formatting thing, thanks. I'll stick to just inline hyperlinks instead of footnotes I think

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It happens to me too, but you can tell for some reason the formatting messes with the proper link. As your screenshot shows there is a random 2 after www in one of the links that isn't written out in the original.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That actually fixed it. In the first link there was a ~ added that threw off the archive page.

Might be the Voyager app. Thanks anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago