this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
1093 points (97.8% liked)

Harry Potter

943 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Are his glasses part of him? I'm gonna say no, I'd go for his glasses.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Fair game to snatch the visually impaired boy’s glasses!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

And if he is wearing them wiel hiding under the invisibility cloak… well then you get both!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Underpants. Especially if you have the high ground.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

See I'm just not sure how accio works, like wouldn't you need to really know exactly what pair of undies he's wearing? Whereas, if they think Potter's sneaking around in the Invisibility Cloak, they would know he's got to be wearing his glasses. And considering they were always getting broken and re-mended, I don't think he has back-ups.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They explain in the game, HL, that when you accio people, you are actually accioing their clothes.

Or it was levioso? I don't really remember

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

For sure, I'm just saying that if you can't see him under the Cloak, you don't know what clothes he's wearing. But you know he's got his glasses on.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Interesting idea. What about "accio" someones boots to trip them

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, that should work as long as you can see the boots. My worry with the Invisibility Cloak is not knowing what pair of shoes he's wearing at the time and accidentally accio-ing his boots from under his bed as he sneaks right past in his slippies.