this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
705 points (97.7% liked)

Funny

9028 readers
1267 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The plagiarism machine vomits out the visual equivalent of text prediction. It isn’t an artist any more than the text prediction on your phone is an author if you hit the next predicted word enough times, people are artists and authors. Image generation is at best a Xerox machine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah well that's just like, your opinion, man.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, it’s based on knowing the difference between a tool and a human being 👍

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I know plenty of human beings who are tools

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And why is that different from a human? Explain in physical, measurable terms.

Give we don't know how our own brains work, I don't think you can.

And if you cannot, you have to use the things that are measurable, which are external.

If I were asked by a person to draw me a fluffy trex, first thing I'm gonna do is go look at pictures of trex and pictures of other dinos with feathers, maybe some fluffy birds.

And then I'm gonna plagiarize, because art is theft.

Tdlr: get off your high horse

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Bro, it’s not a person and it doesn’t think. This is embarrassing for you. This is like thinking there are little people in the TV.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago