this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
466 points (99.2% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

799 readers
1623 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally Posted By u/HumusSapien At 2025-04-10 08:59:46 AM | Source


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes. Either him or AOC would have been great. It's not okay that they were blocked. I'm not okay with it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

AOC was blocked until now by not being at least 35 years old. Approve of that condition or not, at least it's legitimately in the Constitution (unlike the bullshit that torpedo'd Sanders).

[–] cenzorrll 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm ok with the 35 year old limit, I do think someone needs a good amount of life experience before leading a country. I also support limiting it at a max of 65 years.

Old enough to see some shit, young enough that your decisions affect your own life

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

She would be eligible this past election though, but it was pretty stupid all around. She would have been under 35 running, but over by the time she would be taking office, so eligible.