this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
337 points (99.4% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

6213 readers
195 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out [email protected] (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More farmers FOFA.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

after an impassioned speech from a trans representative that we also recently elected. Things aren’t always black and white.

First, I applaud that the legislature rejected the anti-trans legislation, but did you listen to the speech yourself? If not, I recommend it. Its less than 10 minutes.

The tact the representative took wasn't a impassioned speech defending the rights of trans folks on moral grounds (which is a very valid argument in my opinion anyway). It was a brass tacks presentation how people that weren't trans could get caught up in the legislation and be negatively affected. I don't believe the legislature rejected the bill because it would protect trans folks, they did it because it would hurt non-trans folks. As in, it was written too vaguely and wasn't targeting *only * trans folks. I think it was smart of the legislator that gave that speech because they presented an argument they new their ultraconservative colleagues would agree with. I don't fault them for making those points in that way. They were successful in getting the bill defeated. In my mind, that's worth it, however if a new bill is introduced with tighter language I believe the Montana legislature would absolutely pass an anti-trans only bill.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Wait. Now, reading the article is not enough? I need to listen to a 10min speech? /s