this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
107 points (98.2% liked)

Legal News

421 readers
30 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on Thursday held that a Massachusetts law banning the sale, transfer, or possession of an assault weapon is not unconstitutional under the Second Amendment to the US Constitution. This decision comes after Massachusetts resident, Joseph Capen, contended that he was planning on purchasing items covered by the law for purposes of self-defense.

Case file: https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/myvmjqrbdpr/04172027mass.pdf

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

And it has never and will NEVER be used that way. Wouldn't work even if people all stood up to try and use it that way

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Americans are legally allowed to use guns to take down everyone wearing golden trump pin in the white house and they would get away with it in the court afterwards as long as they get every single sympathyzer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Oh yes so all you have to do is murder about 80 million people. Great plan!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What about the American Civil War?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Great example. An armed rebellion failed and killed hundreds of thousands in the process.