PC Gaming

10860 readers

1074 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

EXiLExJD

UncleBadTouch

[email protected]

170

Inzoi's launch is going better than I expected with 'very positive' reviews and 87,000 concurrent players and everyone is almost being normal about it (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 4 weeks ago by alessandro to c/pcgaming

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

genAI apologists are so similar in mentality to the police bootlickers that regurgitate police news statements as if they're the truth.

Krafton is lying to you and just because you saw them throw in an "ethical AI" buzzword you fell for it because you've been conditioned to be gullible and politically neutral when it comes to worker exploitation in the industry.

They've been caught ethicalwashing their Stable Diffusion use as being "an in-house proprietary model". SD is the farthest thing possible from "ethical" genAI (it's inherently an oxymoron anyways).

Here is them on YouTube boasting about how many workers they can lay off now that they've adopted outsourced exploited labor from outside artists for free.

https://www.thegamer.com/i-have-mixed-feelings-about-inzois-use-of-generative-ai/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

So you believe an ethical AI cannot exist no matter what, you accuse me of being a police bootlicker, gullible, and neutral to worker exploitation, and I am supposed to respond to this in good faith? Sorry, not going to take your bait and engage in a flame war with you, after all it is rule 1 here.