this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)
Nova Scotia General
278 readers
26 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The scientific method was designed to overcome natural human biases, like confirmation bias. I think the scientific method and reasonable evaluation of evidence are more so examples of critical thinking than they are common sense (e.g., do unto others as you'd have others do unto you). Big money and right-wing interests are trying to destroy the average person's critical thinking, by defunding DEI, education, and public health authorities - because it gets in the way of them (destroying society to) maximizing their profits.
I'm a university student (health professions education) at a pretty reputable school at the moment. I've seen a professor create unreferenced lecture slides with generative AI. I see lots of people relying on generative AI summaries in their search results pages and going no further. I see lots of students using generative AI to read and/or write papers for them, in addition to look up information.
The brain drain is real. The pride in ignorance (among people who vote for Dump or PP) is real. Per Orwell: If people cannot write well, they cannot think well, and if they cannot think well, others will do their thinking for them.
Climate change isn't real /s
I know we are arguing the same point, but supporting policies that directly harm yourself, your children, your neighbors, etc, should be seen as a failure of critical thinking AND of common sense. Pride in ignorance, like you said, is so anathema to my worldview.