this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
56 points (96.7% liked)

Hardware

1768 readers
88 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well, looking at a microchip under a microscope might reveal a lot about how Intel/AMD/Nvidia design their chips. But it's not going to tell you how those chips were then constructed.

That's extremely specialised knowledge requiring very advanced technology and tooling that's globally only really available at TSMC. It's also so specialised that no one person holds all the knowledge in their head, it requires hundreds or even thousands of people.

But even if you figure that out, you still need to actually know how to build the tools that can manufacture wafers. And that knowledge is almost exclusively known to ASML, a company whose products can cost nearly half a billion dollars each.

China does invest in their own fabs, but even they purchase the (older-gen) tools from ASML. Compared to TSMC, they're 2 generations behind. Compared to ASML, they're 5 generations behind.

That's not to say they aren't innovating by the way. Huawei/SMIC developed chips that are only approx. 18 months behind using innovative techniques that gets more out of the older equipment they're forced to use. It's impressive stuff. But again, this does require the state to throw its full weight behind the initiative to create more domestic manufacturing, which a single billionaire is unlikely to manage on their own.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

So valuable to the point that if anyone, billionaire or invading nation tries to take over, they literally have self destruct built in

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/tsmcs-euv-machines-are-equipped-with-a-remote-self-destruct-in-case-of-an-invasion

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thank you for the detailed response! That's absolutely fascinating!

So does TSMC have some kind of exclusivity agreement with ASML, or is it for financial reasons, or is it mainly a personnel/knowledge issue that gives them their edge?

I suppose any effort to spin up a new fab is going to be behind the 8-ball immediately for a while while they deal with all the issues that arise.

One last thing: could you give some advice on how to get more educated on the topic? Any favourite news sources, or recommended readings, or is it just a matter of "seek and ye shall find"?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

So does TSMC have some kind of exclusivity agreement with ASML, or is it for financial reasons, or is it mainly a personnel/knowledge issue that gives them their edge?

It's all of those I suppose. Not many know how to use ASML's machines, not many have the means to purchase them and then there's export controls that prevent ASML from exporting the latest and greatest to China.

One last thing: could you give some advice on how to get more educated on the topic? Any favourite news sources, or recommended readings, or is it just a matter of "seek and ye shall find"?

Mostly "seek and ye shall find", though I also know a bit from a cousin who works for ASML.