Ukraine

Curious whether a spectacular attack against Moscow during this period would be beneficial to Ukraine or not. Ukraine could always have fought a 'dirtier' version of this war, like how they blew up Dugin's daughter early on. They undoubtedly could be doing more terroristic type attacks in Russia, but one of Ukraine's supporters' valued concepts is the moral high ground. Since the Dugin bombing, they have only targeted high level military officials and a prominent Z Blogger with assassination attacks here and there.

The irony of the orange Moron withdrawing most support is that he has little remaining leverage to make either side do anything. The Art of the Deal, you see. 4D checkers.

If Ukraine launched a wave attack on Victory Day, is it more likely that would trigger a vicious response, demoralize Russians into believing this war isn't worthwhile, maybe both? It would definitely trigger a harsh response - but like the Tet offensive...which was a tactical disaster for North Vietnam...it did shock the U.S. so much that the war was seen as unwinnable afterwards. But - that's not a perfect example, because there is no Walter Kronkite in Russia, and public opinion doesn't count worth a sack of rotten beets.

Hard to say whether Ukraine should respect it and hope it translates to a ceasefire, or whether to really go for it and show the Russians and their leadership that they not only cannot win this war, but that they cannot protect themselves from embarrassment, and that it's not going to get better until they get serious about fucking off.

No serious minded person expects Russia to respect any truce anyways, in the short or long term. The only way to ensure long term peace is to destroy Russia's long term capabilities. Even with European support alone, they can probably continue to bleed out and degrade the Russian war machine for a long time yet. Funny, all Trump's bullshit bluster about how Ukraine 'doesn't have the cards'. They absolutely do. They have a lot more cards to play than Trump does.