this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
27 points (96.6% liked)

Voyager

6390 readers
17 users here now

The official lemmy community for Voyager, an open source, mobile-first client for lemmy.

Download on App Store

Download on Play Store

Use as a Web App

Download on F-Droid

Rules

  1. Be nice.
  2. lemmy.world instance policy

Sponsor development! 👇

Number of sponsors badge

💙

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
27
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by LillyPip to c/[email protected]
 

Took me a while and an AskLemmy post to figure this out, since I initially thought Lemmy was auto-modding commenters (which kinda made me panic), but this is what I see:

I am the only mod in this community, and others aren’t seeing this flag everywhere, so commenters aren’t actually modded.

Is this a bug with Voyager or with my instance?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Hey, thanks for the post. On Voyager, there is no moderator badge. Instead, the username color changes. give yourself a bit of time to get used to it, maybe you’ll end up liking it. :-)

I like it if I’m doing a global search or viewing all or home and one of a posts from the communities that I moderate shows up, then I know that I can moderate it quickly at a glance.

In addition, for admins, both local and remote it changes to red with or without a checkmark inside of the shield as a signal on what actions can be performed by admins on a given piece of content. So it’s a bit more complex than just showing if you can moderate a given post or comment.

[–] LillyPip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Thanks!

This is what I’m seeing:

It’s not a username colour – that would be ideal. It’s a green shield badge.

e: you said: ‘In addition, for admins, both local and remote it changes to red with or without a checkmark inside of the shield as a signal on what actions can be performed by admins on a given piece of content’

I have no idea what you mean by this. We were talking about username colours, and that made sense, though I haven’t seen that. Now we’re on checkmarks, which I see, but doesn’t make sense. Does that make sense?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

What I mean is your username will be green if you distinguish your comment so that others know you’re a moderator.

Voyager doesn’t show users that you’re a moderator unless you explicitly distinguish your comment, to allow you to interact without asserting yourself.

Edit: as an example, I just distinguished this comment

[–] LillyPip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Great, thanks. I love all the customisation features Voyager has!

I still don’t understand all the green shields after every commenter’s name, though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s essentially a shortcut button, that’s all. And show you what actions you can take at a glance on an arbitrary piece of user generated content.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the mod action button should be more similar to the default layout icon from the web UI.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not going to change, sorry. This is the way Apollo has done it and I really enjoy its UX. For new Voyager mods, I recommend giving it time to get used to it.

[–] LillyPip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That’s cool, and I was amongst the biggest Apollo fangirls on the planet, but just because Apollo jumped off a cliff doesn’t mean you have to.

This particular bit of design is not ideal.

I’ve been designing UIs on iOS, Mac, and Windows for decades, and this is confusing.

e: especially for newish users, who we’re trying to attract to Lemmy, right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

New Lemmy users aren’t mods usually, so they won’t see this UI element. In any case though, I like this UI 😉

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)