LillyPip

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] LillyPip 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

That’s cool, and I was amongst the biggest Apollo fangirls on the planet, but just because Apollo jumped off a cliff doesn’t mean you have to.

This particular bit of design is not ideal.

I’ve been designing UIs on iOS, Mac, and Windows for decades, and this is confusing.

e: especially for newish users, who we’re trying to attract to Lemmy, right?

[–] LillyPip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (5 children)

Great, thanks. I love all the customisation features Voyager has!

I still don’t understand all the green shields after every commenter’s name, though.

[–] LillyPip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Thanks!

This is what I’m seeing:

It’s not a username colour – that would be ideal. It’s a green shield badge.

e: you said: ‘In addition, for admins, both local and remote it changes to red with or without a checkmark inside of the shield as a signal on what actions can be performed by admins on a given piece of content’

I have no idea what you mean by this. We were talking about username colours, and that made sense, though I haven’t seen that. Now we’re on checkmarks, which I see, but doesn’t make sense. Does that make sense?

[–] LillyPip 2 points 1 day ago

Yep. And this bug exists in both scenarios.

[–] LillyPip 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

Someone just told me these shields mean I’m a mod and can interact with these posts, but that’s not what it meant to me. To me, it means ‘this user is a mod’, which was super confusing.

I’d instead color the edit menu ellipsis green, not add a shield.

Those tags, like this shield, convey information about the user’s status, not what I can do. The ellipsis tells me what I can do.

[–] LillyPip 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Wait, really?

That’s terrible design. I know I’m a mod and can take action. That’s the point of being a mod. Flagging all comments is superfluous and misleading.

I thought something was wrong with my community.

e: Instead of a shield (which to me means ‘fellow mod’) I’d colour the edit ellipsis green or something. This makes me think the commenter is a mod.

26
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by LillyPip to c/voyagerapp@lemmy.world
 

Took me a while and an AskLemmy post to figure this out, since I initially thought Lemmy was auto-modding commenters (which kinda made me panic), but this is what I see:

I am the only mod in this community, and others aren’t seeing this flag everywhere, so commenters aren’t actually modded.

Is this a bug with Voyager or with my instance?

[–] LillyPip 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It helps to know it’s only on my end, thanks! I was worried anyone could mod my community. Thanks for your input! I’ll put it in as a UI bug. Cheers!

[–] LillyPip 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Awesome, thanks for letting me know you don’t see everyone as mods. That helps me.

[–] LillyPip 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Yes, that one. Here’s what i see:

I’m using Voyager on iOS.

And I don’t see those flags on posts outside my community, anywhere on Lemmy.

e: if you’re not seeing it, it’s likely a bug in Voyager. Thanks for letting me know! I’ll post in in the Voyager community. <3

37
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by LillyPip to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
 

Is this a Lemmy thing? Something with lemmy.ca? Something about Voyager?

I tried looking it up but found nothing that might explain this. I have a community that’s super niche and I don’t post there much, but I do on occasion. I don’t care that it’s not that active – it’s enough for me.

Over the past couple of days, I’ve had a tiny amount of interaction, and everyone who posts seems to be automatically flagged as a mod. What’s happening?

e: this is what I see:

[–] LillyPip 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Oh, that’s all? Followed.

e: thank you.

[–] LillyPip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I’m confused, then. Do I bridge it from Bluesky?

I clicked your link but it didn’t make sense from my end.

[–] LillyPip 1 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Apparently I need to make a new account; it’s been a loooooong time *warning, Reddit link).

I’ll make a new mastadon account and link it here.

 

This relativistic, time-travel spacetime is everywhere metrically flat, excepting a conical singularity. Observers following timelike geodesics can eventually encounter their past selves, aging in the opposite time sense. The spacetime is not time orientable.

“A conical singularity is unlike more familiar curvature singularities,” said Norton. “No matter how close you come to the singularity in this spacetime, the spacetime geometry remains flat and regular with no indication locally of something pathological.”

A spaceship, traveling in a well-behaved region of spacetime, might then encounter this singularity and find its timelike geodesic to be deflected into its past. It would then return to the earlier, well-behaved region of spacetime and the spaceship occupants would encounter their past selves aging in the opposite time sense.

The author anticipates this model being a useful tool for teaching technical aspects of relativity theory.

“The full geometry of this spacetime model can be recovered using rather simple methods,” said Norton. “In addition to seeing the nature of the conical singularity, the analysis requires that students treat spacetime coordinates with extreme care, since they do not have their usual default physical meanings.”

Source: “A simple Minkowskian time-travel spacetime,” by John D. Norton, American Journal of Physics (2025). The article can be accessed here.

 
40
Valueing (lemmy.ca)
submitted 6 days ago by LillyPip to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 

I’ve officially looked at the word ‘valuing’ enough times in trying to spell it that it doesn’t look like a word anymore.

Just look at it Valuing Valueing? Valuing VALUING

This word has broken my brain today, how are you?

 

It looks like they’re actually tier 1 (they seem to be standing on a white platform), but what, if any, weight is each layer above them? I can see narrow platforms, but are they all taking most of the weight?

I’m not sure whether this was meant as an athletic or purely aesthetic display – since they’re billed as ‘acrobats’, I assumed skill was involved, so what would be the best and worst case scenario those 8-10 in the narrowest tier would be supporting?

e: was there any kind of structural support in this? I’m not finding much about it.

Here’s a Snopes article about this event at the 1980s Olympics in Moscow.

211
Edward (lemmy.ca)
 
50
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by LillyPip to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 
1
1011 (self.timetravellerguide)
 

1011

 

Excerpts:

The acceptance of Einstein’s general theory of relativity made time travel physically respectable, because it allows spacetimes in which the timelike curves of observers can form a closed loop. While some theories suggest exotic physics that open wormholes, author John D. Norton has proposed a simpler model in which observers, tracing out timelike curves, might meet their past selves.

An interesting difference between author Norton’s model and that of others is that the model presented here is not time-orientable, which means that it does not have a uniform, forward definition of time. Furthermore, it is matter-free and flat everywhere except for a two-dimensional singularity analogous to the singular point of a paper cone.

“A conical singularity is unlike more familiar curvature singularities,” said Norton. “No matter how close you come to the singularity in this spacetime, the spacetime geometry remains flat and regular with no indication locally of something pathological.”

A spaceship, traveling in a well-behaved region of spacetime, might then encounter this singularity and find its timelike geodesic to be deflected into its past. It would then return to the earlier, well-behaved region of spacetime and the spaceship occupants would encounter their past selves aging in the opposite time sense.

The source paper on AAPT from 1 Mar 2025: A simple Minkowskian time-travel spacetime

 
view more: next ›