this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
10 points (69.2% liked)
change my view
248 readers
2 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
One of our long term goals, as a species, should be to become multi planetary. This fits with our instincts, that spread us all around the planet. To this end, the moon is an excellent test bed. It is far enough away to justify being as self sustaining as possible. But close enough that evacuation back to earth or emergency resupply from earth is reasonable.
There are also financial goals. The moon has easy access to resources that are very useful. Some to earth directly (e.g. helium 3 for fusion reactors) some for space.(E.g. water and low gravity for rocket fuel production). It's basically a launch pad to deeper space.
As for why humans. Simply put, robots aren't yet up to the task of heavy construction. We will need people locally, if only for low lag control. At that point, the extra support structures scale up quite efficiently.
The human element might change with time. But it's a chicken and the egg type problem. Until we have the tech, we will need humans in the loop. However, we likely won't develop the tech without extended experience working on another body.
As for Artemis, it's a first step mission. It's not even the foundation of what we will want to build long term. It's the breaking ground so the foundations can be planned out. It's pure science and trailblazing. It will be decades before we see the true return on the investment. But without the investment, that will just be put off more and more.
You're technically correct, but I think there's a philosophical question that gets left out of the discussion:
Is humanity worth saving?
Having met a fair number of humans, the answer is not an obvious and enthusiastic "yes".
Humanity has a lot of flaws, however, in my opinion, it's still a lot better than nothing. We can work on improving what we have.