Ask Lemmy

31888 readers

1209 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

6) No US Politics.

Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Alternatives to Skype for international calling? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Skype is dead. Need an alternative to make international calls to landlines. Suggestions?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Coolbeanschilly 4 points 2 weeks ago

It would seem you deliberately ignored the "for no particular reason" part of my statement, which acts as an umbrella term specifically for those of the aged population that cannot operate or learn new technology FOR NO PARTICULAR REASON. That can be either cognitive or physical issues, or personal preference.

Nowhere did I imply in my previous statement that the majority of people of advancing years can learn how to operate said modern technology. I was merely pointing out YOUR lack of inclusiveness. Ageist.