this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
13 points (88.2% liked)

USB-C hardware

153 readers
4 users here now

This community is for discussing topics related to USB-C and USB-PD.

Primitive connectors like USB-A and Micro USB are not offtopic, but may elicit a smug sense of superiority.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Let me know what you think, but this cable straight up melted and catched on fire after being put up to its nominal power.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's weird, it says 100W on the connector and 240W on the chip that is digitally read via the tester. Someone really cheaped out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Possibly a case of faulty chips that were supposed to be able to handle 240w, failed QA and got binned and slapped in a 100w cable thinking it's fine and users would just know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah that would be my guess as well.

But honestly who is pumping 240w through a magnetic connector in the first place?!? My MacBook Pro only has a 96w power supply. I mean are you charging a bike with that thing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

usb-c epr supports up to 240w. its still fairly limited on what devices will use that value, but for example, a framework 16 laptop with the 7700s dgpu option can easily pull 180w over usb-c.

no one has practically implemented magnetic cables with the new EPR standard yet though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I'm really curious to see this!