this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
41 points (95.6% liked)
Privacy
2211 readers
486 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The undocumented radio modules were found in the equipment. The radios themselves are the evidence.
When you find a bug in your food, you don't need additional evidence to prove that it's there.
That's evidence for yourself. You need to show it to others or have proof to make others believe your claims. Isn't that how it's supposed to work?
No. Somebody unknown claims that the radios were found in in some unnamed equipment. No photos, no names, no vendors. Do you see the difference?
This is simply a news article reporting a pattern that was found, much like other articles report scientific discoveries or wartime events. It is not a detailed record of the investigation. Do you see the difference?
Manufacturers and vendors are named in the article.
If you want more details, I suggest you contact the people involved in the investigation and ask.
No, they are not, nor the investigators. "The two people declined to name the Chinese manufacturers of the inverters and batteries with extra communication devices, nor say how many they had found in total".
I don't need details on a non-story, thank you very much.