this post was submitted on 18 May 2025
73 points (100.0% liked)
Ukraine
10166 readers
482 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³ Defense Aid π₯
π³ Humanitarian Aid βοΈβοΈ
πͺ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Agreed, so why not built as advanced with European technology instead of old American tech ?
This is one of the few weapons systems that Europeans don't have a decent analogue for. This is likely their short term plan while they develop something similar.
Perun did a decent overview of the capabilities that Europe has in house vs those that they must rely on the US for if you are interested in more details.
Make more sense thanks ! I'll take a look at the overview !
I imagine there's also an element of "what can we start building right now," as opposed to waiting a couple of years for R&D before setting up the production lines. A weapon system can be the most wonderful and powerful thing on paper but if you're under attack you can't deploy a piece of paper.
It's also nice that it turns out old American tech is perfectly capable of dominating Russia's current tech.
Quantity is also important. We can't just rely on a few high-tech systems, we need volumes of simpler equipment as well. These systems are good candidates for stuff we can mass produce right now.