this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
798 points (94.9% liked)

Political Memes

8149 readers
3585 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That was not my experience with 2000. Either 98 or XP (post-SP2) were more solider, from memory.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think you might be confusing Windows ME with 2000.

Windows 2000 was built on the Windows NT kernel which was business focused so absolutely rock solid.

Windows 98 was a good jump in stability from the 95 kernel bit still very prone to crashing.

I agree XP was good but it was the successor to 2K so built on it and I moved to Linux as soon as the 2K directx support would have forced me to move to XP which wasn't as lightweight.

For clarity there were two development branches within Microsoft at the turn of the millennium: one that was based off windows 3.1 (and became 95, 98 and ME) and one that was based off windows NT 3.1 which was solid as fuck and eventually became 2000 then XP.

Edit: Here's a decent graphic: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Microsoft_Windows_versions#/media/File:Windows_Version_History.svg

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh shit, I think you're right!

Now that a stretch my memory back decades, I seem to recall I never extensively used 2000, it was ME.

I agree XP was good

I seem to recall something about XP not being good at the start, and it wasn't until about SP2 that it reached it's famed quality. But now I can't seem to find anything about it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Ah the naming was terrible in fairness... Windows millennium edition and windows 2000. I mean c'mon like. Haha.

And yeah I was gone by SP2 but I remember my gaming friends holding tight to that for as long as they could. There were even various really lightweight editions of SP2 that you could download if you had the balls to install a hacked together operating system from some randomer on the internet. And they all did.

Different times!!

Edit: also what's up Dave on the far side of the world!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Edit: also what's up Dave on the far side of the world!

I'm actually on the close side of the world 🤯