this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
26 points (84.2% liked)

Linguistics Humor

1418 readers
1 users here now

Do you like languages and linguistics ? Here is for having fun about it


For serious linguistics content: [email protected]


Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(For some context, I live in Canada, beer labels are bilingually English & French here)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] preussischblau 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

/r/ is perfectly acceptable to represent that phoneme in a broad transcription. Would only be a problem had ~~he~~ they wrote [r].

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

yeah true. thx. i was just a bit puzzeled bc i assumed [ ].

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

This reminds me Mark Hale using emojis for broad transcription of Marshallese vowels. That was hilarious (and genius - it's a great way to tell people "focus on their contrast dammit").

[–] sik0fewl 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, the question was in []. I responded with // because I'm not enough of an expert to attempt narrow transcriptions 🙂.

[–] preussischblau 2 points 2 weeks ago

That is also a fair point.

[–] Evkob 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Usually I wouldn't bother, but seeing as this is a linguistics community; it's a lot more inclusive to use the singular "they" rather than "he" if you don't know the pronouns one uses.

Signed, not a he.

[–] preussischblau 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I don't necessarily agree with your argumentation generally speaking (both the generic masculine pronoun and singular they are fine in my opinion), but you do literally have your pronouns right there, so I will admit I could/should have avoided the issue anyhow. Sorry about that.

Edit: Oh, also, Weißbier, to answer your post's question.