this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
612 points (99.8% liked)

World News

36450 readers
504 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Qualified immunity; because there is no explicit guidance against police “shooting blonde, female Australian news reporters live on the air while covering an LA protests against ICE on a weekend” - he will be let off with a stern talking to, and a wink.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Immunity" being the immunity of the sovereign. I do not understand how we can embrace this concept as a country 250 years after breaking free of monarchy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a non-American, I find that whole concept absurd - and that’s before learning of its ties to monarchy!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Yes, and I'm not being hyperbolic. If you read early American caselaw explaining the rationale of sovereign immunity, the logic is that in monarchies it drives from the divine right of the sovereign. When we became independent we kept that legal concept, but the judges said that it derived from the will of the electorate rather than the divine right of the sovereign. Of course, the functional outcome was the same....