172
Ukraine’s F-16 Destroys Russian Su-35 in First Air Battle, Backed by Swedish AWACS
(united24media.com)
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
172 points (98.9% liked)
Ukraine
10199 readers
569 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
❗ Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
💳 Defense Aid 💥
💳 Humanitarian Aid ⚕️⛑️
🪖 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Both systems have a place. Your F-16's, F-18's are 'fighters of the line' while the 22 and 35 are more specialized aircraft for different missions.
Oh, absolutely. The best option is of course to have enough of everything. However, the past 20 years we've seen a bunch of western militaries phase out a bunch of their older, simpler equipment in favour of a few high-tech systems.
I think my point is that it may be a mistake to discard large volumes of older systems and replace them with a few new systems. If/when a war happens, we're going to need large volumes of simpler gear as well as the few specialised and modern systems we've developed the past 20 years.
Oh I get what you're saying. But none of the NATO nations are really retiring everything to keep only the newest stuff.
The US has almost 762 active F-16's in the air force, 375ish F15's, 180 22's, and 300 35's. We have almost as many 16's as all the other aircraft, which makes sense. They still work lets fucking use em.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_United_States_military_aircraft