this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
444 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

61263 readers
4544 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
444
OpenAI just admitted it can't identify AI-generated text. That's bad for the internet and it could be really bad for AI models. (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
107 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

OpenAI just admitted it can't identify AI-generated text. That's bad for the internet and it could be really bad for AI models.::In January, OpenAI launched a system for identifying AI-generated text. This month, the company scrapped it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How not? You ever talk to Chat-GPT, it's full of blatant lies and failure to understand context.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And? Blatant lies are not exclusive to AI texts. Every right wing media is full of blatant lies, yet are written by humans (for now).

The problem is, if you properly prompt the AI, you get exactly what you want. Prompt it a hundred times, and you get a hundred different texts, posted to a hundred different social media channels, generating hype. How in earth will you be able to detect this?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just like your comment you say? Indistinguishable from human - garbage in, garbage out .

If you actually used the technology rather than being a stochastic parrot, you’d understand:)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I.. did... it was useless after I realized any research I asked it to help with lead to it lying to me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You don't know what you are talking about. The two are been distinguishable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Clearly not :)