Technology

71995 readers

3689 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

634

Judge Rules Training AI on Authors' Books Is Legal But Pirating Them Is Not (aifray.com)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

255 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Again, you should read the ruling. The judge explicitly addresses this. The Authors claim that this is how LLMs work, and the judge says "okay, let's assume that their claim is true."

Fourth, each fully trained LLM itself retained “compressed” copies of the works it had trained upon, or so Authors contend and this order takes for granted.

Even on that basis he still finds that it's not violating copyright to train an LLM.

And I don't think the Authors' claim would hold up if challenged, for that matter. Anthropic chose not to challenge it because it didn't make a difference to their case, but in actuality an LLM doesn't store the training data verbatim within itself. It's physically impossible to compress text that much.