this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
513 points (97.2% liked)

Memes

51504 readers
1187 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 day ago (23 children)

The engineers knew! They begged them to stop the launch, but of course, no one makes the wheels not capitalism stop rolling! ~~profit~~ progress at all costs!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yep, the soviet space program took fewer lives overall.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I haven’t forgiven them for sending up a dog and a monkey though

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

I don’t forgive the nazis or the americans either

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Nedelin disaster claimed more lives than NASA did over its entire existence.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nedelin was a part of the millitary rocketry program, not the space program. If you want to include Nedelin, then the ICBM disasters in the US should also be included. The space programs and ICBM programs were very closely related on both sides, but if we strictly keep it to the space program the soviets were safer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ICBMs are spaceflight rockets, imo it's best to count them. The US hasn't had such large accidents with ICBMs, mostly minor ones.

Even if we exclude those it's not true. The US has sent significantly more people into space than the Soviets did, so NASAs accident rate was lower (hence safer), even if the absolute number of deaths was higher.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

Spaceflight rockets are ICBMs, if we are being pedantic. The space program was the civilian-facing part of the broader rocketry programs.

Either way, if we exclude them, it is still true, but you can also measure by ratio. It just goes to show that you can manipulate real data to be presented in any way you want, and add or subtract context as needed for your angle.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Did they have a comparable number of people sent to space?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

During the space race, sure, from what I can find.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Fewer human lives—sure, if you only include verified deaths—but the Soviet space program had considerably more deaths overall once you factor in other animals.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Not actually true, both sides used animal testing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Both sides sent animals into space, and many didn't return. Animal testing in particular isn't something unknown to science, nor was it done out of intentional cruelty nor for the purpose of profits, like the cosmetics industry. I feel like you're narrowing in on something that ultimately isn't an equivalent comparison, especially when compared to the scale of the food industry and its systematized mass brutality every second of every day.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Cite your sources please. Without verifiable sources, you're just making shit up.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Am I making up that the US sent animals into space? What claim do you think I'm making up? I already linked my source 2 comments ago.

load more comments (18 replies)