this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
188 points (96.1% liked)

Firefox

20329 readers
328 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One thing you'll often see is that "new" browsers - i.e. with no browser history, extensions, etc. - perform better than one you've been using for a while. Thus, when people switch browsers, the new one tends to feel faster, regardless of what you're switching to.

Possibly, Firefox feels just as fast after a refresh. Alternatively, a fresh profile using the new profile manager might do the same.

On the other hand, it could also be that that specific site has just been tested and optimised in Chrome, with Firefox mostly ignored because too few people use it :(

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am not interested in that performance though. I have two extensions: ublock and darkreader. I care which is faster with these enabled: hardened firefox or hardened ungoogled chromium.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Sure. It could still be worth checking a fresh profile and installing those two extensions - it could still be faster.