PC Master Race

15430 readers

125 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No NSFW content.
No Ads / Spamming.
Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.

Notes:

PCMR Community Name - Our Response and the Survey

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

483

Latency just still isn't there unfortunately (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

204 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Ironically, if they were analog wireless, thered be no latency at all

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So basically radio? It would still be limited by the speed of light, you would have nanoseconds (or microseconds?) of latency!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ten nanoseconds of travel time for every three meters of distance, or roughly one nanosecond per foot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Wired head phones are also limited by the speed of light

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

You have a pretty noticeable fidelity drop when going over radio waves, though. Any pro audio devices like wireless microphones or IEMs will go over radio waves, though. Works fine for on stage use but isn't ideal in other settings.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Even cable has latency...