this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
728 points (99.5% liked)

News

36782 readers
2409 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A U.S. citizen on her way to a medical appointment in Minneapolis was dragged out of her car and detained by immigration officers, according to a statement released by the woman on Thursday, after a video of her arrest drew millions of views on social media.

Aliya Rahman said she was brought to a detention centre where she was denied medical care and lost consciousness. The Department of Homeland Security said she was an agitator who was obstructing ICE agents conducting arrests in the area.

That video is the latest in a deluge of online content that documents an intensifying immigration crackdown across the midwestern city, as thousands of federal agents make arrests amid protests against what local officials have likened to a "federal invasion."

Rahman says she was on her way to a routine appointment at the Traumatic Brain Injury Center when she encountered federal immigration agents at an intersection. Video appears to show agents shouting commands over a cacophony of whistles, car horns and screams from protesters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rustyfish@piefed.world 101 points 2 months ago (10 children)

To anyone who didn’t vote last year because they didn’t like the democrats position to a 100%:

I hope you are happy with what you have enabled. You must feel quite clever right now❤️

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I hate the establishment Dems, neo-liberals suck. But I still voted for them because the actual Fascists and Nazis were unconscionable.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's like a choice between getting a cavity and getting curb stomped.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

It's more like a choice between voting for Nazi Germany or voting for Vichy France

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Having two federal parties with the Dems and Republicans being the only feasible options sounds antidemocratic. A true democracy would be a bit more.. representative.

I would adore having a half dozen political parties along the spectrum to vote for. I wouldn't vote for anything less than mild progressivism but still.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

Our voting system is fucked is the problem.

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

200 NGOs Oppose Biden’s Historic Expansion of ICE Detention System: "Detention should not be about politics."

ICE records show Biden admin plans could give Trump a head start on deportations

President Biden Signs Anti-Immigrant Spending Bill Reaching Trump-Era Highs

Biden’s Emergency Funding Proposal Seeks $14 Billion for Immigration System From Congress

Tom Homan - Border Czar was originally appointed by Obama

Keep in mind, these democrat moves to bolster ICE were happening while the right was blatantly telegraphing their moves to immediately weaponize ICE once they took power. Project 2025 came out and promised to use ICE to plunder and abuse Americans. Biden and team then spent the next 4 years not only failing to prepare for Trump, but preemptively strengthening the mechanisms Trump would eventually use to carry out project 2025. The democrats are controlled opposition.

Sure, maybe we wouldnt be seeing this intense of immigration enforcement if Kamala were in charge, but if she were, she'd be working behind the scenes to ensure the right had all the tools they needed when the time was right.

The democrats are controlled opposition and the American electoral system is kabuki theater. The fascist descent is the only logical conclusion to the American political experiment- which was predicated on the wholesale genocide of Native American Indians and quickly pivoted to enslaving an entire continent.

You realize what the only logical conclusion to your "pragmatic liberal utilitarianism" is, right? I give it 4 years before youre chiding leftists for not voting for dem candidate Ted Cruz as he campaigns against republican candidate Mecha Hitler. Youll still see nothing wrong with that. You will sell out the victims of American Imperialism to buy yourself 4 more years of political waffling - just as you did with Palestinians.

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Damned if you do and damned if you don’t. If they had stopped money to ICE it would have been all over the airwaves. “Dems soft on immigration”.

[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And if you've reached a point in your political experiment where the only viable "opposition" party is obligated to massively fund fascist brownshirts in order to stay relevant, your experiment has lost legitimacy and must be dismantled.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

1 billionaire owns like 70% of the radio across the country, doesn't matter what you say the right's propaganda machine will always be on target.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago

Wouldn't be hard to fight back if a broken immigration system wasn't a bipartisan effort to encourage illegal immigration and let farmers take advantage of workers.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

BuT TeH GeNoCiDe D:

Great job, now we have genocide AND this bullshit. Thank you so much for saving Palestine! You fucking did it, I guess.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 11 points 2 months ago

Trump: Yes to Genocide

Harris: I see you, I hear you, but also Yes to Genocide

I voted for Harris because obviously but also I 100% put the blame where it belongs: the DNC.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Oh, they sure AF do. Just talked to one of these dipsticks in person recently. They feel very clever and smug and look forward to accelerating shit into some kind of Marxist utopia.

And of course, the 'net is lousy with these types.

It's all so dumb.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

The DNC did the enabling. They had plenty of opportunity to run a viable candidate or run a stronger campaign with the candidate they settled for and did neither.

[–] Arctic_monkey@leminal.space 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, because why blame the corrupt leadership for offering people shit to eat, blame the people for not being happy eating their shit, because look how much worse shit can be shoved down your throat if you don't like it!

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

You should post this on x.com or something. Imagine thinking anyone on this site didn't vote.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"voting is wrong" was an incredibly popular position on lemmy

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

people conflated "voting won't save us" with "voting won't do anything". If voting was useless they wouldn't try so hard to stop people from doing it. But also, voting one day a year and shrugging your shoulders 364 days and year cause "I voted" wasn't enough.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago

yup. this is my position, too. get active, stay active.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't think I've actually seen that in the wild. Usually what I see is either "voting is insufficient" as in, "historically voting has not ended a dictator's career" or just badly disguised bad faith/bot stuff often from accounts banned before I read their comments.

I feel like "voting is wrong" is what a group of the latter (bot farmers/trolls) want folks to believe is a real opinion here but I haven't seen anyone make that argument in good faith. I've only ever seen it made secondhand in a way that makes it about as credible as a sasquatch sighting (which there 100% are people dressing up as the sasquatch to fuck with people, so real sasquatch sightings =/= real sasquatches existing)

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

You would be quite surprised by the amount of Americans on here who didn't vote. I have come across quite a lot

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

There's entire groups on Lemmy where you get banned if you support either US party

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Were you not here before the election...?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah there were a lot of bot/troll accounts saying that stuff. The fact it disappeared after the election proves the point: nobody actually believes that. If somebody dresses up as a sasquatch and runs through the woods it doesn't mean sasquatches are real even though it may be followed by credible accounts and videos of a sasquatch running through the woods.

Elections are when there's a heavy financial incentive for some folks to make bad faith arguments to everyone they can.

[–] rustyfish@piefed.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So it’s trolls as long as it “proves” your point? Buddy, I like the drugs you do 👍🏼

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It proves the point because sock puppets are real thing thats been documented. Can you say for certain none of the 'left wing activist' people that has replied to a comment around an election is not a sockpuppet account or bot?

I think if you cannot find these people in the real world AND they only show up around election time AND no notable, verified people online are espousing the same stuff then its a reasonable assumption its fabricated.

The right wing in particular uses a lot of sockpuppets and has a history of invented strawmen. There are instances of republican senators playing black republicans online.

Its either an effective tactic because they're constantly in power or its something they believe works.