this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
17 points (90.5% liked)

Vancouver

1484 readers
3 users here now

Community for the city of Vancouver, BC

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] villasv 4 points 2 years ago (6 children)

A person with no access to housing. Most people would refer to one as “homeless”.

[–] Shaul 0 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Why not say "homeless" since there is no such word as "unhoused"?

[–] villasv 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Well, there is such a word, you’ve just encountered it.

As for why, I guess each person might have different motivations to use it but I’d say the more probable one is an attempt to emphasize that the lack of housing is something inflicted on people, hence the use of X-ed (victim) instead of X-less (attribute). Someone can choose to be homeless (like nomads), but the unhoused are so against their will. Similar to preferring marginalized over minority, or impoverished over poor.

[–] Shaul -3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Oh, you are a stunted pretntious grandious infantile.

Those are all actual words with dictionary definitions that you can look up in the dictionary of your choice.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

What has you so angry here? Your lack of recognition of a word doesn't deligimitze it. New words are invented all the time to describe changing circumstances. You realize you're on an experimental platform full of "words" like fediverse and activitypub, right?

[–] villasv 3 points 2 years ago

If your definition of “words that exist” is having them on dictionaries, then we’re still good because there are dictionaries that include unhoused already.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)