this post was submitted on 26 May 2021
3 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

32665 readers
945 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (4 children)

Wow...


Q. Will Audacity remain open source?

A. Yes. Audacity was, is, and always will be 100% open source and free in every sense.

The CLA also allows us to use the code in other products that may not be open source, which we intend to do at some point to support the continued development of Audacity. We can already do this with the code we write ourselves, but the CLA allows us to do it with our contributors' code too. This is necessary because community code and internal code often get mixed in ways that are difficult to separate later on.


So, it'll remain open source, but any code you contribute out of the goodness of your heart, we can take and do with it as we may... wtf...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago

Yep, don't contribute to a corporate open-source project with a CLA, unless you're into doing free labour for other people's financial gain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

So, it’ll remain open source, but any code you contribute out of the goodness of your heart, we can take and do with it as we may… wtf…

To be fair, this is kind of true of many open source licenses. GPL is the only one I can think of that disallows this...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago

And yet this is a GPL licensed product that they're working around that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

What if community contributions were released as a series of patches not integrated directly?

A package maintainer could download audacity source, then the community patches and make a release with them for your distribution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

Yeah, it's a sneaky way to turn it into proprietary software. On the question "How do you respond to those who believe that a CLA is against the spirit of the GPL?" they don't answer, they just hedge around the topic. I don't like what I read in that FAQ.