this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
242 points (98.8% liked)

Fediverse vs Disinformation

2033 readers
31 users here now

Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.

Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.

What's the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.

By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.


Community rules

Same as instance rules, plus:

  1. No disinformation
  2. Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation

Related websites


Matrix chat links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“The people that are the most susceptible to the corporate bullshit tended to choose the worst solutions to those problems on a consistent basis,” Littrell said.

Hmmmmmmmm.

Well that goes some way partially to explaining why management at large corporations almost as a rule are uselessly incompetent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Littrell noted the workers who participated in the study all came from highly educated backgrounds in HR, accounting, marketing and finance, had bachelor’s degrees and even PhDs, which shows the findings go beyond simply assessing the intelligence of the study participants.

Actually, I'm not convinced that we've managed to eliminate that hypothesis. The only group that gives me pause is accounting.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

“Study finds graduates of programs that require colouring inside the lines do well at colouring inside the lines at work.”

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Additionally: it confuses intelligence with learning. Having a PhD is a sign of the later, not of the former.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A PhD is when you know everything about one specific rock on the beach, is how I put it. You know exactly where it is, all of its properties, and can go to it any time. Outside of that one rock, maybe a slightly above-average person, but nothing special.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 3 days ago

Yup, pretty much. Someone who learnt all the bits and bobs of that rock; but that doesn't mean the person has strong cognitive capabilities, not even to solve tasks related to that rock.

[–] Calirath@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Education ≠ intelligence. To quote Berkeley, "Few men think; yet all will have opinions."

[–] lath@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All of those sound structured backgrounds that apply fixed definitions and derivatives based on that. They lack a developed sense of creativity outside the rigidity of their domain and so, are pretty much biological LLMs after a decade of purposed training and instructions.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

so, are pretty much biological LLMs after a decade of purposed training and instructions.

🤯

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not a single hard science occupation in engineering or technical aspects? Yeah that's a shit biased study.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

people in hard sciences aren't getting jobs in HR dude.