TubularTittyFrog

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Truth doesn't feel good. People want to feel good.

Psychologically it's not different than biology in the sense that people don't want to work out and eat healthy... they want to be lazy and eat energy dense food.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yep. Anger and egotism are proven my studies to basically be like taking a hit of cocaine. It gets people off and they get addicted to it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Bingo. This is the fundamental disconnect I encounter on a daily basis. All anyone wants to do is lecture me about how they are right, and I am wrong if I think different than them. And if you don't give into them they simply start insulting or shaming you, hoping they can emotionally abuse you into compliance with their beliefs. Or they just think you are evil and divide the world up into hyperbolic terms.

That isn't how you learn or win people over to your side. All it does is promote ignorance & alienation, and that's what we have an overabundance of in our current society.

I'm apparently old-fashioned/out of date, but I went to college to learn how to understand, assess, and communicate with other people... seems like that is no longer what people are taught or at least, no longer value it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Because it is disingenuous. Most feminism frames the world in terms of women's interests and experiences, and elevates them above men's. It doesn't seem a middle ground or acknowledge the difference in the sexes. It just sort of adopts 'women are wonderful' bias through and through, without realizing that women can be, and often are, awful people.

Liberation requires acknowledging our shared humanity outside of identity labels, but that type of thinking isn't emotionally motivating for people because it can't take a 'us vs them' approach.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That sounds like you have a mental health problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Depends on how badly he fucks up the country.

We won't get legit progressive reform until there is another depression or world war.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes. Democractic establishment throws elections away rather than tries to win them. And frankly the professional elite base of the party is more than happy with it and thinks if you disagree with them you're an uneducated sexist/racist.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's also far less effective than building a strong politician coalition, as Trump and his supports did.

Frankly if I went to a MAGA rally I'd probably feel more accepted and welcomed than I by my fellow Democratic voters. And this is why Trump got so many votes this time. His supporters are enthusiastic, energized, and generally welcome to anyone who is angry and upset. Democrats kept chiding the voters they should be so lucky to have a black female president in such a great economy and if you weren't supporting them you were a bad person.

Frankly as a white guy from a working-class background, all the D have done for me is alienate me for 20+ years now. And tell me that I should vote for them anyway.

Ok, you’re right in this sense. However, I meant beaten badly in the sense of expectations vs. reality. If you followed any media, it was supposed to be a slight edge for Kamala, or at least a good chance for an upset. In the end the R’s got president, senate and congress. And the outcome was clear after the first few hours, unlike something like Gore vs. Bush.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Most telling move IMO is how they sidelined Tim Walz for being 'too radical'.

All he was doing was talking facts and smack. Democrats can't have that! It's not decent!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Funny thing about most leftist activist groups is they won't take a hard stance because they are afraid it will dry up the money spigot by 'looking bad'.

And of course the virtue signalling and purity tests that inevitable result in them become taking fascist stances towards groups they don't like.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I beat elden ring and the expansion.

it took me 200 hours. it took me 6+ months and a few holiday breaks to do it.

most games are like 1/10 of that length. game is crazy massive and long and detailed. and id' probably have to sink 500h+ to get all the details and endings and experience the various play styles.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

because i'm at work. or tired as fuck at the end of a long day.

 

Or is it just doomed to the vapidity of sterile commercialization?

It feels like everything is serious these days... and 'humor' is only of the commercial variety. Joke communities and circlejerk communities are considered 'hate groups' now. Mods will ban you for sarcastic comments on 'serious' topics, and even on non serious ones, and everything is politicized either by trolls, bots, or whackjobs.

It's boring when you can't joke anymore. I miss my internet communities of 5-10 years ago when you could joke around, and even people of different beliefs and persuasions could laugh at themselves.

Now everything is so deadly serious. It's a complete bummer. And any sort of 'edge' or sarcasm or sardonic remarks are ban-worthy.

I guess it's just poe's law run amok? I feel like mods could tell the difference 10 years ago and the non-jokey psychos were just ignored.

view more: next ›