Technology
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
view the rest of the comments
I know Google does many evil stuff, as mega corporations do since that's how you become that big in the first place, but I don't think this is one of them. There is no monetary gain from it, if it was done for that reason why not pay man less too? Also I don't Google would let this information out so easiely if it's true, why not put employees under NDA so they can't talk about how company treats them? Google may be evil but they aren't stupid, the men these women are talking about were probably in higher position or were more well known and established.
Also if I am at lemmy and fedi in general chances are I'm not brainwashed by corporate propaganda. When mega corporations do things like this there is a reason for it, as unethcial and gross as that may be... unless it's Ubisoft I guess.
If you systematically pay a huge percentage of workforce less, how is there no monetary gain?
If you can pay a sizable chunk of your employees less and it works, why not pay all of your employees less?