this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Soccer (Closing)

157 readers
1 users here now

This community is being retired in favor of [email protected].

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The red bull multi ownership model is not good for the sport so the comment about business first and football second is a bit ironic

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am not basing my comment exclusively on the Premiere League, every professional league and club is a business, just like Red Bull.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

funny to see english fans argue who the worst team is in their league

Flair of a corporation that started this multi-ownership bullshit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Huh never thought of it, was Red Bull really the first?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Daz just gud business!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

That's not true. Their land and their old training ground was built near Paseo de la Castellana in 1963, but back then it was on outskirts of the city.

That land was worth fuck ton after 30 years when city grew, this is what the build on it after:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuatro_Torres_Business_Area

They moved to unconnected unbuilt outskirts of Madrid once again, which are still half-empty to this day, called Valdebebas.

Here's HITC Sevens episode about it, when I learned it from:

https://youtu.be/ao5gccLtRL8?si=3EfB8NVAbfrOsg3e&t=319

Here's article about it, title is:

"EU Court rules Real Madrid got no state aid in land deal"

https://www.euronews.com/2019/05/22/eu-court-rules-real-madrid-got-no-state-aid-in-land-deal

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Not good for the sport but very good for red bull and the clubs they own. That’s not ironic.