this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2021
15 points (94.1% liked)
Asklemmy
44656 readers
920 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
copyleft is a virus
100% agreed. Copyleft is a cancer. It grows and grows and it imposes restrictions.
But it's a great cancer - because these restrictions prevent removal of freedom. These restrictions throttle greed and hurt those who don't want to give back. GPL forces companies to help the little ones, and it's one of the reasons why BSDs can't catch up to Linux.
wrong, copyleft cannot be enforced
Theory vs Practice, BSD vs GPL.
In theory, using BSD means companies give back. They don't.
In practice, using GPL means companies must give back. They do.
There's exceptions to both rules (i.e Onyx or Netflix) but those are undeniably the exception rather than the rule. This is supported by the progress made with copyleft licenses.
capitalism is evil, copyleft just reinforces it