this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
100 points (100.0% liked)
196
17065 readers
1457 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts require verification from the mods first
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
the red lines indicate cuts
so on the left side, it displays two manners you could "make" pants from the forms presented. (the top series showing getting two pairs of pants from the one form and the bottom only getting one pair from the form)
the right side shows those same forms but with the cuts shifted along the surface in such a way that they are topologically similar (or something) in that they still maintain 3 holes. in essence, this image is stating that the shapes on the right are perfectly valid pants since they follow the same '3 hole rule' and are created from the same exact forms that create a universally recognized pair of pants.
Am I topological pants