this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
394 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

63897 readers
6231 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The company's website quotes a storage density of 3.5 kWh/kg and a storage system taking up 3 cubic meters beving able to store 100,000 kWh: https://www.photoncycle.com/technology

I tried to find the patent but it sounds like the application process isn't complete yet.

These are the kind of claims you hear from a startup seeking its next round of funding. I'd take it with a huge grain of salt.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

the numbers do seem absurdly high. That's 5 times higher energy density than the current state-of-the-art

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'd take it with an amount of salt resembling the Dead Sea. This is absolutely fake.