this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
172 points (96.7% liked)

World News

33700 readers
371 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Question... why wasn't this an unmanned, remotely controlled submarine with a front-mounted camera? If it had been destroyed, that would have been a lot of money up in smoke, but no lives lost.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Cause then they couldn't hold over their billionaire friends head's that they've actually been there!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Because the purpose was to see it in person. If they wanted to see footage of it they could do that from home but there' s definitely something for seeing things with your own eyes.

I'm completely oboard with what they wanted to do since cameras never do a sight justice. They just did it in a really sketchy way. Of course I'm also cool with people doing sketchy things but it sure seems this was being done as a business thing with customers and without proofing it multiple times. And honestly this should've been just an ROV with passenger capsule and probably tethered.