this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2021
53 points (98.2% liked)

Open Source

32727 readers
114 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Every IT project of German authorities failed in the last two decades. So this is a bad news because the project will fail too and they will say it was because Open Source does not work.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

Jan Philipp Albrecht notes of the Munich failure: “The main problem there was that the employees weren’t taken along enough. We do better. We are planning long transition phases with parallel use, and we’re introducing open source step-by-step when the departments are ready. With this, we also create the reason for further introduction, because people can see that it works.”

https://fossforce.com/2021/11/a-german-state-is-saying-goodbye-windows-hello-linux/

It will depend on people wanting to use it, but, imo, governments and government agencies ought to be using, and suggesting that others use, open technologies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago

The main problem there was that the employees weren’t taken along enough.

Somewhere I heard that the project was suffocated by bureaucracy, whether intentionally or not I don't know. But I can imagine that the lobbying of Microsoft supported bureaucratic behaviour. I wish them all the best, but the history of governmental IT projects is a story of failure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

i infuriates me how microsoft is stealing tax money and has held a global monopoly for decades. especially when there are free alternatives. it isn't even legal for a foreign private company to hold monopoly and extract tax wealth. most other software they use follow these rules, so why not windows/office?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago (1 children)

It infuriates me too.

I really don't understand how it's acceptable for shops to sell devices pre-loaded with Micro$oft products, without letting the consumer know that there's the license fee included in the purchase. But, as you say, this practice has gone on for decades.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

that too, that just further adds to the issue. hell, industry standards like adobe literally only exist because they didn't pursue pirates (profit came from business license) and the adobe suite was the only tools people knew at the time due to being available for "free" to home users. a statement which the CEO admitted, but then had to redact. i assume by pressure from the music industry, sony's rootkit model, etc. at the time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Imagine the software that could have been written with the money that microsoft sucked up into their shitty OS

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 years ago

and contribute to society/the world while doing it.

so many opportunities has been lost because of capitalism. it's not like private companies ever take risks either, they use the freely available research and development we paid for with our taxes and then sell it back to us as a product.

nope. open source everything. it's the only way to save the planet.