this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
13 points (74.1% liked)

Fediverse

18053 readers
74 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A response to Daring Fireball's recent thinkpieces about Fediverse admins wanting to block Meta's new ActivityPub platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

@deadsuperhero Why the ad hominem in the title? Completely unnecessary, and actually proving his point about pettiness.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You don't know what you're talking about.

/s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

@NettoHikari Says a person who does unpaid work for Condé Nast? In order to prove the same point again? Cool.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@NettoHikari Ah OK. Wasn't aware of that shorthand. First time I've ever seen it on fedi.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Sorry, as you guessed right, I'm a Reddit refugee. Pretty common on there.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Probably true.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

No, if I wanted to be petty, I would've called him an idiot. This is an opinion piece focused on the idea that he's uninformed on the nuance of the situation.

I promise, this is in good faith.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@deadsuperhero Just because you disagree with some things, and you've been here from the start, doesn't mean someone doesn't know what they're talking about. And even if that would be the case, it's an unnecessary insult that makes the recipients of the counterarguments less receptive to whatever is being laid out below.

So if it's in good faith, then I think that's just a poor choice of title. Only wanted to point that out. Feel free to ignore it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

But he doesn't know what he's talking about. Either that, or he's knowingly spouting bullshit in bad faith.

So I guess he could just be a liar. But I doubt that's what you mean.